|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Black Voices Column | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Published: Feb. 16, 2005
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights—Out of Commission The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957, reconstituted in 1983, and reauthorized in 1994. It is directed to investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices; study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin; submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress; and issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws.
The group’s former chairman, Mary Frances Berry, has been the most single
destructive force within the commission. She proved to be a grossly
incompetent member and a management disaster as chairman. In 1997, the General Accounting Office, the nonpartisan investigative arm of Congress, found the Civil Rights Commission to be "an agency in disarray, with limited awareness how its resources are used ... the Commission could not provide key cost information for individual aspects of its operations ... significant agency records documenting Commission decision-making were reported lost, misplaced or nonexistent ..." The report went on to questioned why only 10 percent of the CRC's money went to the anti-discrimination investigations and reports that are the agency's mission. It found that CRC reports took so long to complete that in many cases they were outdated and irrelevant by the time they were issued. For example hearings on the Los Angeles riots of 1992 weren't held until 1993 and the report wasn't issued until May, 1999.
We don’t need more civil rights or anti-discrimination laws on the books, we
need more and better enforcement. The CRC has proven it’s irrelevance and
should not be continued just because of an symbolic or emotional attachment.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web site by: Webulant Web Consulting