|
Published: February 5th, 2009
Steele Determination
The past three weeks I have been a witness to
history that I never dreamed I would see. I was at Obama’s swearing in on
January 20th. Then last week I watched the election of Michael Steele to be
the first Black and new chairman of the Republican National Committee. The
power of the two offices are not comparable, but their significance is.
I have known Michael Steele for many, many years and consider him to be a
friend. I have watched him persevere through many ups and downs. His will to
succeed is unquestioned. Becoming chairman was the easy part.
Managing people’s expectations of him and his chairmanship is the more
difficult task. Black Republicans are going to expect him to right all the
wrongs in the party when it comes to their participation. Whites are going
to expect him to be colorblind.
Please keep in mind that Steele is basically the chief executive officer of
the Republican Party and has to report to its 168 member board of directors
(they consist of the national committeemen/women and state party chairs from
all 50 states and territories).
There is a difference between having the title of chairman and having the
authority of chairman. Steele is very, very good on TV and radio. He is also
a great communicator (notice that I didn’t use the term “articulate”). He
will definitely be a great messenger for the party. But, the question is not
the messenger, but the message.
Steele is not the Black chairman of the party. He is chairman of the party!
But, they are not mutually exclusive. The main reason he won the race for
chairman is the party needed a fresh face and a good communicator. On that
basis, Steele was far and away the best candidate. But, there is another
reason that you won’t hear discussed in polite company. The Obama effect.
Republicans were terrified of having a white party chairman criticizing the
first Black president of the U.S. This is a silly argument if the criticisms
were based on issues, not innuendo (“palling around with terrorist”). This
was the sentiment expressed to me by several members of the national
committee after Steele’s election.
I understand the political realities of this thinking, but the visual of
Steele criticizing our first Black president makes me a little
uncomfortable. Even if it is done totally on the issues. This is the PR side
of me. Steele has to be extremely careful of how he navigates between the
Black and white worlds of Republican politics.
The first true sign of how Steele will handle this dilemma will be who he
hires on his personal staff and those in key positions within the committee.
Will any of the top positions be filled with a Black person(s)? Positions
like chief of staff, political director, press secretary, or finance
director.
If the answer is no, then my greatest fear will have been realized. If the
answer is yes, will Steele give them the authority (budgetary and hiring) to
do what needs to be done. Just like many think Steel is a fresh face and
voice for the party, he has to bring fresh faces and voices to the
committee’s staff. Typically Blacks have been left out of these positions
and never given any consideration.
Will a new face truly bring new ideas and approaches inside the committee’s
power structure? Will Steele call the party out when they use race baiting
and race politics? Or will he try to be diplomatic or excuse their use?
Though he is chairman of the national party, he has an obligation to speak
directly to Black Republicans about their role and future in the party in
very specific terms. Will Black Republicans finally be given a chance to get
consulting contracts from the committee, will they be considered for key
jobs within the committee and on Capitol Hill? Will they finally be brought
into policy discussions? These are just a few questions that Steele needs to
address immediately.
As with President Obama, Steele doesn’t get a pass from the Black community
in order to prove to whites that he is “color blind.” We are more
sophisticated than to expect him to cater to all of our parochial concerns.
But, we do expect him to acknowledge his Blackness by speaking directly to
us and telling us were we fit into his plans. The model for this approach is
former secretary of state Colin Powell.
After unanimous senate confirmation to be secretary of state in January of
2001, one of the first acts of Powell was to meet with foreign service
officers from the African bureau.
Powell went on to allocate a $1 million grant to better prepare minorities
for careers as diplomats in the U.S. Foreign Service. Powell presented the
grant on May 17th, 2002 to the Ralph J. Bunche International Affairs Center
of Howard University (one of the top historically Black universities in the
country). The event was held at the Department of State. As if that wasn’t
enough, Powell also arranged for the MacArthur Foundation to give a matching
grant of $ 1 million. Powell indeed had budgetary and hiring authority to go
along with the title. His legacy is being felt well beyond his service.
That is my challenge to Michael Steele. We are very proud of your historic
election. You are a great person and extremely likable. You have been given
great communication skills. But long after you have left office, will anyone
feel your legacy?
RAYNARD
JACKSON
Arlington
Raynard Jackson is president & CEO
of Raynard Jackson & Associates, LLC., a D.C.-based political
consulting/government affairs firm
Article Keywords: Michael Steele, Chairman, Republican
National Committee, RNC, Colin Powell,
Barack Obama, Republican Party, Black Chairman, Black Republican, Raynard Jackson
, political consultant, political columnist
|